Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorŽelinský, Tomáš
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-20T08:55:03Z
dc.date.available2016-01-20T08:55:03Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationE+M. Ekonomie a Management = Economics and Management. 2013, č. 3, s. 4-19.cs
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609 (Print)
dc.identifier.issn2336-5604 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ekonomie-management.cz/download/1404726186_f0d2/2013_3+Enviromentalna+Kuznetsova+krivka+a+pozicia+Slovenska+a+Ceskej+republiky+v+Evropskej+unii.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11025/17507
dc.format16 s.cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isosksk
dc.publisherTechnická univerzita v Libercics
dc.relation.ispartofseriesE+M. Ekonomie a Management = Economics and Managementcs
dc.rights© Technická univerzita v Libercics
dc.rightsCC BY-NC 4.0cs
dc.subjectenvironmentální Kuznetsova křivkacs
dc.subjectkritický bodcs
dc.subjectSlovenskocs
dc.subjectČeská republikacs
dc.titleEnviromentálna Kuznetsova krivka a pozícia Slovenska a Českej republiky v Evropskej uniisk
dc.title.alternativeEnvironmental Kuznets curve and the position of Slovakia and the Czech republic in the European unionen
dc.typečlánekcs
dc.typearticleen
dc.rights.accessopenAccessen
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.description.abstract-translatedThe aim of this article is to analyse the position of Slovakia and the Czech Republic in the European Union from the viewpoint of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis. Econometric models for panel data with CO 2 emissions as the dependent variable and four different types of macroeconomic aggregates are employed in the study. The EU-27 data used in the study supports the hypothesis of the EKC. As the EU countries are heterogeneous, the countries are further classified into “rich” and “poor” (according to the level of their GDP), and further analyses are performed. Considering the “rich” EU countries the EKC hypothesis holds, but if the “poor” EU countries are taken into account, the coefficient of the quadratic regressor is positive which relates to the traditional U-shaped curve, not the inverted one. Such a finding is still not in contradiction to the EKC hypothesis, as it assumes that at the low level of economic output, as the development progresses, the emissions increase. The estimated value of the EKC turning point is 19 660 USD (constant 2000 USD) which has not been reached by the “poor” EU countries yet. As for the position of Slovakia and the Czech Republic in the EU, the results are not unambiguous. The CO 2 emissions have been decreasing very slightly in both countries since 1992 (with 1.33 percent mean annual rate of decrease in Slovakia and 1.16 percent mean annual rate of decrease in the Czech Republic). The GDP per unit of energy use (constant 2005 PPP USD per kg of oil equivalent) increased from 3.15 USD to 6.33 USD in Slovakia between 1990 and 2010 (i.e. 3.54 percent mean annual growth rate). The mean annual growth rate of the Czech GDP per unit of energy use was slightly slower: 2.71 percent.en
dc.subject.translatedenvironmental Kuznet´s curveen
dc.subject.translatedturning pointen
dc.subject.translatedSlovakiaen
dc.subject.translatedCzech republicen
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
Appears in Collections:Číslo 3 (2013)
Číslo 3 (2013)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2013_3 Enviromentalna Kuznetsova krivka a pozicia Slovenska a Ceskej republiky v Evropskej unii.pdfPlný text1,06 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11025/17507

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

search
navigation
  1. DSpace at University of West Bohemia
  2. Publikace ZČU / UWB Publications
  3. Časopisy ZČU / UWB Journals
  4. Ekonomie a management
  5. 2013
  6. Číslo 3 (2013)