Full metadata record
DC poleHodnotaJazyk
dc.contributor.authorZanker, Marek
dc.contributor.authorBureš, Vladimír
dc.contributor.authorCierniak-Emerych, Anna
dc.contributor.authorNehéz, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-14T07:46:44Z
dc.date.available2021-06-14T07:46:44Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationE+M. Ekonomie a Management = Economics and Management. 2021, roč. 24, č. 2, s. 207-222.cs
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609 (Print)
dc.identifier.issn2336-5604 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11025/43629
dc.format16 s.cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTechnická univerzita v Libercics
dc.rightsCC BY-NC 4.0en
dc.subjectObecné nařízení o ochraně údajůcs
dc.subjectEvropské zeměcs
dc.subjectosobní datacs
dc.subjectzabezpečenícs
dc.subjectsoukromícs
dc.subjectindividuální právacs
dc.titleThe GDPR at the organizational level: a comparative study of eight European countriesen
dc.typečlánekcs
dc.typearticleen
dc.rights.accessopenAccessen
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.description.abstract-translatedThe General Data Protection Regulation, also known as the ‘gold standard’ or the ‘Magna Carta’ of cyber laws, is a European regulation that deals with rights in the area of privacy and focuses on data collection, storage and data processing. This manuscript presents the results of investigation in the business sphere from eight countries of the European Union. The research focused on awareness of the GDPR, costs associated with the GDPR, number of trainings, how data are secured and subjective evaluation. The questionnaire was used for data collection. The results show that the majority of employees concerned about the GDPR are able to define the GDPR correctly (64%). The correct identification of personal data is in 95% of cases. The vast majority of respondents (94%) assign the right to personal data protection to the GDPR. Most employees are trained in the GDPR once (46%) or twice (45%). Subsequently, the differences between these countries in some areas of the questionnaire survey were examined. For this purpose, Welch ANOVA with post-test Tukey HSD or Kruskal-Wallis test were used. As a result, knowledge about the personal data do not vary significantly between the countries. In the area of rights, the countries are not again statistically different. As for the number of security countries, statistics do not differ significantly. The subjective assessment of the GDPR is different across the countries. The GDPR is rated worst by companies in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. On the contrary, the GDPR is best perceived by companies in France and the United Kingdom.en
dc.subject.translatedGeneral Data Protection Regulationen
dc.subject.translatedEuropean countriesen
dc.subject.translatedpersonal dataen
dc.subject.translatedsecurityen
dc.subject.translatedprivacyen
dc.subject.translatedindividual rightsen
dc.identifier.doi10.15240/tul/001/2021-2-013
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
Vyskytuje se v kolekcích:Číslo 2 (2021)
Číslo 2 (2021)

Soubory připojené k záznamu:
Soubor Popis VelikostFormát 
EM_2_2021_13.pdfPlný text580,24 kBAdobe PDFZobrazit/otevřít
Zobrazit minimální záznam Zobrazit statistiky


Použijte tento identifikátor k citaci nebo jako odkaz na tento záznam: http://hdl.handle.net/11025/43629

Všechny záznamy v DSpace jsou chráněny autorskými právy, všechna práva vyhrazena.

hledání
navigace
  1. DSpace at University of West Bohemia
  2. Publikace ZČU / UWB Publications
  3. Časopisy ZČU / UWB Journals
  4. Ekonomie a management
  5. 2021
  6. Číslo 2 (2021)