Full metadata record
DC poleHodnotaJazyk
dc.contributor.authorUhrin, Michal
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-31T09:20:19Z
dc.date.available2022-01-31T09:20:19Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationAntropowebzin. 2021, č. 1-2, s. 21-27.cs
dc.identifier.issn1801–8807
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.antropoweb.cz/webzin/index.php/webzin/issue/current/showToc
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11025/46645
dc.format7 s.cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isosksk
dc.publisherAntropoWebcs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAntropowebzincs
dc.rightsAntropoWebzin vychází pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/cs
dc.subjectmetodologický agnosticismuscs
dc.subjectpozitivismuscs
dc.subjectvědecký skepticismuscs
dc.subjectobjektivnostcs
dc.subjectsubjektivitacs
dc.subjectantropologický výzkumcs
dc.titleMetodologický agnosticizmus a vedecká antropológia v antropologickom výskume náboženstvask
dc.typečlánekcs
dc.typearticleen
dc.rights.accessopenAccessen
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.description.abstract-translatedThe aim of this article is to contribute to debates on the question of objectivity and subjectivity in anthropological research, which has been prominent in academic discourse since the second half of the 20th century. The paper focuses on selected approaches to subjectivity and objectivity in relation to the anthropological research on religion. The paper scrutinises methodological approach known as methodological agnosticism. Methodological agnosticism has been significantly influenced by the ideas of positivism and scientific scepticism, which are also discussed in the paper. The article presents the mentioned approaches and argues in favour of their effectiveness in anthropological research of religion.en
dc.subject.translatedmethodological agnosticismen
dc.subject.translatedpositivismen
dc.subject.translatedscientific scepticismen
dc.subject.translatedobjectivityen
dc.subject.translatedsubjectivityen
dc.subject.translatedanthropological researchen
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
Vyskytuje se v kolekcích:Číslo 1-2 (2021)
Číslo 1-2 (2021)

Soubory připojené k záznamu:
Soubor Popis VelikostFormát 
291-575-1-SM.pdfPlný text146,24 kBAdobe PDFZobrazit/otevřít


Použijte tento identifikátor k citaci nebo jako odkaz na tento záznam: http://hdl.handle.net/11025/46645

Všechny záznamy v DSpace jsou chráněny autorskými právy, všechna práva vyhrazena.