Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAtan, Arzu
dc.contributor.authorAtan, Tarik
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-03T14:54:13Z
dc.date.available2024-02-03T14:54:13Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationE+M. Ekonomie a Management = Economics and Management. 2023, roč. 26, č. 4, s. 38-50..cs
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2336-5064 (online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11025/55256
dc.format13 s.cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTechnická univerzita v Libercics
dc.rightsCC BY-NC 4.1en
dc.subjectmanagementcs
dc.subjectorganizační občanské chovánícs
dc.subjecttransformační vedenícs
dc.subjecttransakční vedenícs
dc.subjectznalostní pracovnícics
dc.subjectkomplementárnícs
dc.titleManaging intellectuals: Reaping the most and the best of knowledge workers in the post-COVID worlden
dc.typečlánekcs
dc.typearticleen
dc.rights.accessopenAccessen
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.description.abstract-translatedThe COVID-19 crisis forced massive changes in work practices, channeling most of the activities to digital/remote work paradigms almost overnight. In this post-COVID locked-in world, traditional top-down control and command mechanisms simply ceased to exist. Profoundly different approaches and understandings became necessary to reap the most and the best outcomes from workers. In this new paradigm, cultivating organisational citizenship behaviors might be the most – if not only – viable way to ensure comprehensive results and sustained success. That necessitates a highly rooted insight into the influences of leadership styles. This article discusses the constructs of transactional leadership and transformational leadership styles. Contextualisation of the data patterns investigates the interrelationships between these two styles by comparing and contradicting their effects on organisational citizenship behaviors. It explains how these two approaches work in tandem for better results, mutually enabling each other, like the two legs of an athlete, where the lack of one profoundly cripples the outcomes, making the other ineffective as well. Using a survey inquiring about the perceptions of online knowledge workers, a three-step analysis was conducted and, as a result, established a robust argument that these two leadership styles are not paradoxical; they need not be mutually exclusive or contradicting can enable and complement each other. This finding is crucial for managing knowledge workers and knowledge workers as managers.en
dc.subject.translatedmanagementen
dc.subject.translatedorganisational citizenship behaviorsen
dc.subject.translatedtransformational leadershipen
dc.subject.translatedtransactional leadershipen
dc.subject.translatedknowledge workersen
dc.subject.translatedcomplementaryen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2023-4-003
dc.type.statusPeer revieweden
Appears in Collections:Číslo 4 (2023)
Číslo 4 (2023)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
E+M_4_2023_03.pdfPlný text1,22 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11025/55256

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.