Full metadata record
DC poleHodnotaJazyk
dc.contributor.authorPichova, Simona
dc.contributor.authorCernohorsky, Jan
dc.contributor.authorKacerova, Markéta
dc.contributor.authorZila, Jan
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-03T15:25:54Z
dc.date.available2024-02-03T15:25:54Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationE+M. Ekonomie a Management = Economics and Management. 2023, roč. 26, č. 4, s. 134-147..cs
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2336-5064 (online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11025/55263
dc.format14 s.cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTechnická univerzita v Libercics
dc.rightsCC BY-NC 4.1en
dc.subjectkvantitativní uvolňovánícs
dc.subjectkvantitativní uvolňovánícs
dc.subjectEvropská centrální bankacs
dc.titleA critique of quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve System and the European Central Banken
dc.typečlánekcs
dc.typearticleen
dc.rights.accessopenAccessen
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.description.abstract-translatedThe application of quantitative easing tools by certain central banks has been and continues to be the subject of professional debate. Therefore, this paper aims to assess an alternative scenario to the use of quantitative easing. We have used counterfactual analysis to estimate GDP growth in the US and in the Eurozone for the period during which quantitative easing was implemented, i.e., since 2009 in the US and since 2015 in the Eurozone. We used a vector autoregression (VAR) model for the analysis. We concluded that, in retrospect, the use of quantitative easing appears to be unwarranted. While there was slightly higher GDP growth in the Eurozone than there would have been without quantitative easing, there was no smoothing of the economic cycle. At the same time, returning to the inflation target took a relatively long time. In the US, quantitative easing prevented an initial slide into a deep recession and smoothed the economic cycle over the medium term. Overall, however, quantitative easing has mostly had a negative effect. One major negative is that when this instrument is used over a long time period, economic subjects gradually come to see it as a standard tool. Furthermore, inflation, central banks’ main objective, did not rise rapidly over the period in question; on the contrary, over the long term, quantitative easing has become one of the factors behind today’s higher inflation rates. An excessive monetary supply has created imbalances in the financial markets and has been a factor in price bubbles in the stock, bond, and property markets. Last but not least, it has increased moral hazard for governments, which have gone further into debt without difficulty. At the same time, central bank independence was violated, which has caused an abnormal increase in the central banks’ balance sheets. We, therefore, recommend that this unconventional monetary policy instrument should only be used in the short term for emergency situations as a clear central bank…en
dc.subject.translatedquantitative easingen
dc.subject.translatedthe Federal Reserve Systemen
dc.subject.translatedthe European Central Banken
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2023-4-009
dc.type.statusPeer revieweden
Vyskytuje se v kolekcích:Číslo 4 (2023)
Číslo 4 (2023)

Soubory připojené k záznamu:
Soubor Popis VelikostFormát 
E+M_4_2023_09_corr.pdfPlný text1,87 MBAdobe PDFZobrazit/otevřít
Zobrazit minimální záznam Zobrazit statistiky


Použijte tento identifikátor k citaci nebo jako odkaz na tento záznam: http://hdl.handle.net/11025/55263

Všechny záznamy v DSpace jsou chráněny autorskými právy, všechna práva vyhrazena.

hledání
navigace
  1. DSpace at University of West Bohemia
  2. Publikace ZČU / UWB Publications
  3. Časopisy ZČU / UWB Journals
  4. Ekonomie a management
  5. 2023
  6. Číslo 4 (2023)