Full metadata record
DC poleHodnotaJazyk
dc.contributor.authorBlechová, Kristýna
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-25T07:49:57Z
dc.date.available2022-07-25T07:49:57Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationActa Fakulty filozofické Západočeské univerzity v Plzni. 2022, č. 1, s. 37–50.cs
dc.identifier.issn1805-0364 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2336-6346 (online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11025/49240
dc.format14 s.cs
dc.format.mimetypeappliaction/pdf
dc.language.isocscs
dc.publisherZápadočeská univerzita v Plznics
dc.rights© CC BY-NC-ND 4.0en
dc.subjectkmotrovstvícs
dc.subjectsociální kapitálcs
dc.subjectreciprocitacs
dc.subjectsociální statuscs
dc.subjectprestižcs
dc.titleReciprocita a reprodukce sociálního kapitálu v kontextu kmotrovských vazebcs
dc.title.alternativeReciprocity and Reproduction of Social Capital in the Context of Godparent Tiesen
dc.typečlánekcs
dc.typearticleen
dc.rights.accessopenAccessen
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.description.abstract-translatedThis study focuses on the role of godparenthood in building social capital in Europe during the 19th century. It seeks to explain how social capital was reproduced in horizontal and vertical ties and what role reciprocity played. However, reciprocity is viewed primarily in the narrow context of social capital theory. Texts on godparenthood usually point to relationships based purely on utilitarian grounds. They typically lack support in social science theory and the terminology used is rarely discussed in detail. Drawing on basic texts from social capital theory or anthropology and history (in the case of godparenthood), the aim of the present text is to outline how social capital can be practically built through godparent relationships. In the introductory section, the basic structure of the reciprocity process is presented. The following passages focus specifically on the application of reciprocity in godparent relationships. The paper first seeks to answer a question that follows quite organically from the previous theoretical introduction. How is it possible that the so-called integrative ties (trust or solidarity) developed based on godparent ties, which were often purposively concluded and characterised by a negotiated and fully institutionalised type of exchange?en
dc.subject.translatedgodparenthooden
dc.subject.translatedsocial capitalen
dc.subject.translatedreciprocityen
dc.subject.translatedsocial statusen
dc.subject.translatedprestigeen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.24132/actaff.2022.14.1.3
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
Vyskytuje se v kolekcích:Číslo 1 (2022)
Číslo 1 (2022)

Soubory připojené k záznamu:
Soubor Popis VelikostFormát 
3-Acta-2022-1-Blechova.pdfPlný text228,32 kBAdobe PDFZobrazit/otevřít


Použijte tento identifikátor k citaci nebo jako odkaz na tento záznam: http://hdl.handle.net/11025/49240

Všechny záznamy v DSpace jsou chráněny autorskými právy, všechna práva vyhrazena.