Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSellke, Lina
dc.contributor.authorPatan-Zugaj, Bianca
dc.contributor.authorLudewig, Eberhard
dc.contributor.authorCimrman, Robert
dc.contributor.authorWitter, Kirsti
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-28T10:00:08Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-28T10:00:08Z-
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationSELLKE, L. PATAN-ZUGAJ, B. LUDEWIG, E. CIMRMAN, R. WITTER, K. Comparison of Six Different Methods for Measuring the Equine Hoof and Recording of its Three-Dimensional Conformation. JOURNAL OF EQUINE VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2023, roč. 121, č. FEB 2023, s. nestránkováno. ISSN: 0737-0806cs
dc.identifier.issn0737-0806
dc.identifier.uri2-s2.0-85146009713
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11025/53869
dc.format
dc.format17 s.cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.iso
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherW.B. Saundersen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal Of Equine Veterinary Scienceen
dc.rights© The Author(s)en
dc.titleComparison of Six Different Methods for Measuring the Equine Hoof and Recording of its Three-Dimensional Conformationen
dc.typečlánekcs
dc.typearticleen
dc.rights.accessopenAccessen
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.description.abstract-translatedDifferent measuring techniques have been used to objectify the classification of hoof shape. The MicroScribe is a novel tool that might prove useful for measuring hooves without prior reconstruction or compensation of projection artefacts. The aim of this study was to compare biometric data of the equine hoof collected by the MicroScribe tool and measurements collected directly from hooves, scaled photographs and radiographs, from photogrammetry models and computed tomography datasets. The suitability of MicroScribe generated data to differentiate individual hoof conformations was tested. A total of 62 measures were recorded from 16 forehooves. 21 linear and nine angular measures were collected by at least four methods each, and evaluated further by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). Ratios and differences of these measures were calculated as suitable for the definition of hoof shapes and analysed as well. Absolute equivalency of methods was detected for five linear and none of the angular measurements. The precision of the tested measurement methods was comparable. In some cases, different methods measure different structures. Radiographs tended to overestimate, while computed tomography slides to underestimate distances. Photogrammetry and scaled photographs were less suitable for measuring hoof angles. The MicroScribe tool can readily be used for hoof measurements. Its values for linear measures showed good equivalency with other methods based on real hooves. For angular measurements, the uneven hoof surface might introduce imprecision. Not all hoof conformations could be detected based on measuring results alone. Diagnosis by a skilled veterinarian is still essential.en
dc.subject.translatedhorseen
dc.subject.translatedhoof shapeen
dc.subject.translatedmeasurementen
dc.subject.translatedMicroScribeen
dc.subject.translatedbiometryen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jevs.2022.104195
dc.type.status
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.identifier.document-number918481400001
dc.identifier.obd43939950
Appears in Collections:Články / Articles
OBD

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
CIMRMAN_Comparison_of_six_Different_Methods.pdf2,57 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11025/53869

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

search
navigation
  1. DSpace at University of West Bohemia
  2. Publikační činnost / Publications
  3. OBD