Full metadata record
DC poleHodnotaJazyk
dc.contributor.authorSležková, Anna
dc.contributor.editorKnoll, Vilém
dc.contributor.editorHablovič, Jakub
dc.contributor.editorHanzlová, Karolína
dc.contributor.editorKotroušová, Denisa
dc.contributor.editorMach, Ondřej
dc.contributor.editorMifek, Jan
dc.contributor.editorSchwarzová, Aneta
dc.contributor.editorVrba, Vojtěch
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-06T18:37:39Z
dc.date.available2024-04-06T18:37:39Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationKNOLL, Vilém, HABLOVIČ, Jakub a kol (eds.). Naděje právní vědy 2022: Právní věda v praxi, Plzeň 25. listopadu 2022, s. 601-610.cs
dc.identifier.isbn978-80-261-1217-4
dc.identifier.isbn978-80-261-1216-7 (brožovaná vazba)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11025/55457
dc.format10 s.cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isocscs
dc.publisherZápadočeská univerzita v Plznics
dc.rights© Západočeská univerzita v Plznics
dc.subjectzákaz zpředmětnění člověkacs
dc.subjectlidská důstojnostcs
dc.subjectHannah Arendtovács
dc.subjectmoccs
dc.subjectpředsudekcs
dc.titlePřínos politické teorie Hannah Arendtové pro uchopení zákazu zpředmětnění člověka jako ústavněprávní kategorie: Na rozcestí mezi otázkou proporcionality a legitimitycs
dc.typekonferenční příspěvekcs
dc.typeconferenceObjecten
dc.rights.accessopenAccessen
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.description.abstract-translatedIn its case-law, the Constitutional Court opened the way for a ban on the objecti fication of human beings in the Czech constitutional order. However, the actual content of this prohibition has remained unclear and its impact banal. It has become a call for strict consideration of the specific circumstances of the case under the proportionality test. It is only in later times that decisions of the Con stitutional Court have emerged which shift the impact of this prohibition to the level of legitimacy. Hannah Arendt’s political theory offers important concepts that can help to elaborate the content of the prohibition precisely in terms of the question of legitimacy. Using her notion of power and prejudice, it is possible to propose an understanding of the prohibition of objectification of man as their political freedom, that is, as their right to share in power and to be free from prejudices that would imply their incapacity, unfitness or unworthiness for such a share. Such a conception, however, brings about a radical reversal in the assessment of the legitimacy of the interference with human rights. It necessarily excludes individual interventions based on scientific knowledge of the human being and seeking to treat the future risk that a person’s behav iour may pose to society or to themselves. This notion of legitimacy is already emerging in international human rights law, most notably in the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The space freed up by refraining from the described individual interventions does not necessarily remain empty. It is not only possible, but even obligatory, to concentrate efforts on treating potential risks to society and the individual by focusing on the environment and advocating for its accessibility for everyone.en
dc.subject.translatedprohibition of the objectification of manen
dc.subject.translatedhuman dignityen
dc.subject.translatedHannah Arendten
dc.subject.translatedpoweren
dc.subject.translatedprejudiceen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.24132/ZCU.NADEJE.2022.601-610
dc.type.statusPeer revieweden
Vyskytuje se v kolekcích:Naděje právní vědy 2022
Naděje právní vědy 2022

Soubory připojené k záznamu:
Soubor Popis VelikostFormát 
978-80-261-1217-4-1uvod.pdfPlný text571,65 kBAdobe PDFZobrazit/otevřít
978-80-261-1217-4-615-624.pdfPlný text114,02 kBAdobe PDFZobrazit/otevřít


Použijte tento identifikátor k citaci nebo jako odkaz na tento záznam: http://hdl.handle.net/11025/55457

Všechny záznamy v DSpace jsou chráněny autorskými právy, všechna práva vyhrazena.